Gluten

The article I read is called "against the grain" by Michael Specter. The purpose is to discuss wether gluten has health disbenefits for those who do not have celiac disease or at least a gluten sensitivity. The subject was gluten. Occasion was the rising amount of people avoiding gluten despite not having celiac disease. The audience was readers of the New Yorker. The author did a fairly good job showing both sides of the argument. He uses logos by mentioning studies that have been done, showing both their results and numbers of participants. He also mentions proven statistics. He uses ethos by mentioning his own personal experiences. His pathos is mostly found in anecdotes he tells of other people.